Tag Archives: NERSA
Explore how NERSA shapes South Africa’s energy landscape through regulation of electricity, piped gas, and petroleum. This tag highlights tariff decisions, policy reforms, and regulatory frameworks that impact businesses, municipalities, and consumers. Learn how organizations can navigate compliance, manage costs, and leverage opportunities created by NERSA’s oversight in building a resilient energy future.
Reforming NERSA requires more than cosmetic changes—it demands a comprehensive approach rooted in accountability, transparency, and technical competence. As South Africa’s energy future hangs in the balance, the regulator must evolve from reactive decision-making to proactive governance. By strengthening oversight, aligning with international best practices, and prioritizing consumer protection, reform can restore trust, stabilize the sector, and ensure that energy regulation serves the public interest rather than perpetuating inefficiency.
Notice: JavaScript is required for this content.
NERSA’s role in South Africa’s electricity sector is pivotal, yet increasingly contested. As the regulator, it must balance utility sustainability with consumer protection, but inefficiencies, opaque processes, and inconsistent decision-making have eroded trust. A critical examination reveals the urgent need for reform—strengthening transparency, aligning with global best practices, and ensuring that regulation drives stability, efficiency, and fairness across the energy landscape.
Notice: JavaScript is required for this content.
Notice: JavaScript is required for this content.
Notice: JavaScript is required for this content.
Here is a **concise, strong excerpt** suitable for a **website blog preview, homepage teaser, or newsletter intro** (±70–90 words):
—
South Africans are once again being asked to pay more for electricity while receiving less of it. NERSA’s Redetermination of Eskom’s MYPD6 Regulated Asset Base attempts to shift the cost of decades of mismanagement, inefficiency, and regulatory failure onto consumers. In a context of declining demand, chronic load shedding, worsening power quality, and repeated court losses by the regulator, this decision is neither fair nor defensible. This article explains why the MYPD6 RAB Redetermination must be rejected in full—and why consumers should no longer be forced to carry Eskom’s baggage.
NERSA has once again proven its incompetence—ignoring critical warnings, losing court battles, and forcing consumers to pay billions for technical losses that stem directly from poor power quality. Instead of protecting the public, the regulator has become a liability, wasting taxpayer money while unbalanced networks quietly destroy our equipment and drain our economy. The question is unavoidable: why are we funding failure instead of demanding accountability?
- 1
- 2








