My Journey in the Power Sector: From Fieldwork to Enterprise Asset Management

In the heart of South Africa’s power sector, I embarked on a journey that would shape my career and broaden my understanding of the complexities of power distribution and transmission. From October 1974 to May 1975, I served as an official at Eskom, the country’s primary electricity supplier. My role was far from being confined to an office; it was a hands-on experience in the field, bringing me face-to-face with the practical aspects of power distribution and transmission.
As an official at Eskom, my responsibilities were diverse and critical to the smooth operation of the power networks. I oversaw the day-to-day functioning of the Distribution and Transmission Power Networks, ensuring efficient power distribution from our facilities to homes, businesses, and other establishments across the region. Additionally, I was tasked with maintaining these power networks, conducting regular inspections, troubleshooting, and coordinating major maintenance projects to ensure the reliability and safety of Eskom’s power networks.
Fast forward to March 1976, my career took a significant turn when I was promoted to a new role overseeing the maintenance management for the entire region. This role introduced me to the Paper-Based Maintenance Planning and Tracking system, the backbone of our maintenance operations. However, I quickly realized its limitations. We were maintaining equipment at predetermined intervals, without considering its actual condition. This approach seemed inefficient, as unnecessary maintenance could potentially degrade the equipment’s performance.
The paper-based system posed several other challenges. It was prone to human error, and extracting meaningful insights from the records was a complex process. The administrative tasks associated with the system were time-consuming and labor-intensive. This experience laid the foundation for my future endeavors to improve maintenance operations in the power sector.
This realization sparked a need for a more efficient solution to maintenance planning. I began exploring the potential of a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). The transition to a CMMS marked a shift from a reactive to a proactive workflow, focusing on planned and scheduled maintenance. The CMMS offered valuable insights into organized, proactive workflow arrangements through system modeling. This period marked the first time that the Distribution and Transmission departments started working with a CMMS, a significant step forward in our journey towards efficient maintenance management.
Over the years, the field of Maintenance Management has evolved into a more comprehensive discipline known as Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). This shift marked a new era in the management of physical assets, extending beyond maintenance to include the entire lifecycle of an asset. This evolution towards EAM was a path that I began to tread in the subsequent years. I recognized the potential of this holistic approach to asset management and started working towards integrating it into our operations.
Following a two-year tenure as a District Manager, I had the opportunity to oversee a broad spectrum of business operations. This role encompassed a wide range of responsibilities, from managing Human and Financial Resources to overseeing Operations and Maintenance. It also included supervising Engineering and Construction projects.
Two years following my role as District Manager, I was appointed as the Manager of the Protection, Telecommunications, Metering, and Control Systems (PTM&C) department. This role demanded a deep understanding of each system under my purview and the ability to integrate them effectively. It required strategic planning, effective communication, and strong leadership skills to ensure the department’s objectives were met.
However, after this extensive stint, I found myself returning to a familiar territory. I was tasked with overseeing the transformation of our Maintenance Management system into an Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) system for the entire Distribution Division. This transition was not just about changing systems; it was about changing mindsets. It involved shifting from a traditional maintenance-focused approach to a more holistic asset management strategy.
In retrospect, this journey of transforming our Maintenance Management into an Enterprise Asset Management system has been a challenging yet rewarding experience. It has not only improved the efficiency and effectiveness of our asset management practices but also contributed to the overall growth and success of our organization. It’s a journey that continues to this day, as we constantly strive to improve and adapt to the ever-changing landscape of asset management.

Newsletter

Our newsletters aim to enlighten our audience about current trends and events. We strive to distribute a newsletter at most once a week, but the frequency may vary to avoid inundating our website visitors with irrelevant content.

The most recent newsletters will be dispatched via email to all individuals on our mailing list and will also be accessible under this menu section.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Power Networks in Flux – Balancing the Unbalanced

Unbalanced network conditions in power supplies can be deceptive because phase-to-neutral voltage measurements might not reveal the full picture. Here are why phase-to-phase voltages might not be close to each other even if phase-to-neutral voltages are:

  1. Unmatched Impedance: If the impedance in the transformer banks is unmatched, it can cause unbalanced conditions that are not apparent in phase-to-neutral measurements but will affect phase-to-phase voltages.
  2. Large Single-Phase Loads: When large single-phase loads are unevenly distributed across a three-phase network, it can create an imbalance that affects phase-to-phase voltages.
  3. Generation Faults: Faults in power generation can lead to unbalanced conditions that might not be detected by measuring phase-to-neutral voltages alone.

In the case of Linden and Modderbee, officials may overlook unbalanced conditions by only considering phase-to-neutral or phase-to-phase voltages. It is crucial to measure both to get an accurate assessment of the power supply’s balance. Unbalanced conditions can lead to equipment damage, increased network losses, and inefficiencies. Therefore, comprehensive measurements and analysis are necessary to ensure the reliability and safety of the power supply.

To determine if you are paying too much for electricity, you can indeed perform a simple check using a clip-on ammeter and a voltmeter to calculate the apparent power in volt-amperes (VA). Here is how you can do it:

  1. Measure the Current (I): Use the clip-on ammeter to measure the current flowing through the circuit.
  2. Measure the Voltage (V): Use the voltmeter to measure the voltage across the circuit.
  3. Calculate Apparent Power (S): Multiply the current by the voltage to get the apparent power in VA.
  4. Determine the Cost: Multiply the apparent power by the tariff rate provided by your electricity supplier.

This method gives you an instantaneous reading of your power usage, which you can compare with your electricity bill to see if there is a significant discrepancy. If you suspect your meter is faulty, having it tested is a good option despite the initial cost which would likely be refunded if the meter is indeed faulty. Regular monitoring of your power usage can help you identify any inconsistencies or potential overcharges on your electricity bill.

To accurately determine if you are being overcharged for electricity, it is essential to consider the following assumptions:

  1. Constant Current and Voltage: The assumption that current and voltage remain constant is a simplification for calculation purposes. These can fluctuate due to various factors such as appliance usage and utility supply stability.
    • Perfect Power Supply: Assuming a perfect power supply without any fluctuations is an ideal scenario often used in theoretical calculations but not typically found in residential settings.
  2. Synchronized Timing: Starting the measurement process at the same time as the meter reading ensures that the comparison is based on the same usage period, which is crucial for accuracy.
  3. Meter Accuracy: It’s assumed that the meter is accurately measuring the power consumption without any faults or errors.
  4. No Unauthorized Usage: This assumption implies that there is no electricity theft or unauthorized usage being recorded on your meter.
  5. No Additional Charges: It’s assumed that the bill reflects only the cost of electricity consumed, without any additional fees or charges that could affect the total amount due.

By carefully considering these assumptions and comparing your actual power usage with the billed amount, you can determine if there is a discrepancy. If you suspect an error, it may be necessary to have your meter tested or to consult with your electricity provider for clarification. Remember, the accuracy of your determination is contingent upon the validity of these assumptions. If any of these assumptions do not hold true, the conclusion drawn about overcharging may not be reliable. These assumptions are necessary for a simplified calculation, but they do not reflect the complexities of actual power usage and supply conditions. For a more accurate assessment, a continuous recording of power consumption over the billing period, accounting for fluctuations, would be required. This data could then be compared with the meter reading on your bill to determine if there is a discrepancy indicating you might be paying too much for electricity. If such a discrepancy is found, it would be advisable to have your meter tested. Remember, the cost of testing the meter is typically refunded if the meter is found to be faulty.

Unbalanced voltage conditions in power supplies can indeed have significant effects, even if they are not immediately obvious. Let us explore why phase-to-phase voltages might not be relatively close to each other, despite phase-to-neutral voltages appearing balanced.

  1. Voltage Imbalance and Its Causes:
    • Voltage imbalance occurs when the voltages in a three-phase system are not equal. It can result from various factors:
      • Generation Faults: Issues in the power generation process can lead to voltage imbalances.
      • Unmatched Impedance: Transformer banks with unmatched impedance can cause imbalances.
      • Single-Phase Loads: Unevenly distributed single-phase loads across the three phases can create voltage imbalances. For example:
        • If one phase carries significantly more current due to single-phase motors or heating/cooling loads, the line-to-neutral voltage of that phase will be lower than the other two.
        • Similarly, if most of the load is connected over only two phases, one line-to-neutral voltage will be higher than the other two.
      • Unbalanced voltage affects both induction motors and electronic rectifiers.
  1. Effects on Induction Motors:
    • Motor Torque and Speed: Unbalanced voltage negatively impacts motor torque and speed.
    • Noise: Motors may produce excessive noise.
    • Current Imbalance: Voltage imbalance can lead to increased current imbalance.
    • Temperature Rise: The temperature rise due to voltage imbalance can be much greater than the percentage of imbalance itself.
  2. Why Phase-to-Phase Voltages May Differ:
    • Even if phase-to-neutral voltages appear balanced, phase-to-phase voltages can differ due to the specific load distribution.
    • Consider a scenario where:
      • Phase A has a higher load (more single-phase devices connected).
      • Phase B and C have relatively lower loads.
    • In this case:
      • The line-to-neutral voltage of Phase A will be lower.
      • The line-to-line voltages (Phase A-B and Phase A-C) will also differ.
    • Thus, phase-to-phase voltages may not be close to each other, even when phase-to-neutral voltages seem balanced.
  3. Practical Implications:
    • Unbalanced voltages can lead to equipment damage, motor inefficiencies, and increased network losses.
    • Monitoring phase-to-phase voltages is crucial to identify and address voltage imbalances.

Remember that maintaining balanced voltages across all three phases is essential for a stable and efficient power supply. If you encounter unbalanced conditions, further investigation is necessary to ensure the health of your electrical system.

A deep understanding of the complexities involved in electrical power systems and the importance of accurate billing are based on the actual power consumption. Concerns should be raised about the potential discrepancies in power distribution and billing, especially in the context of an unbalanced network where inefficiencies can lead to increased apparent power and potentially higher charges for consumers.

Here is a brief overview of the power types:

  • Real Power (P): This is the power that performs work in the circuit, such as running appliances or lighting. It is measured in watts (W) and is what consumers ideally should be billed for.
  • Reactive Power (Q): This power does not perform any real work; instead, it is used to maintain the electric and magnetic fields in inductive and capacitive loads. It is measured in volt-amperes reactive (VAR).
  • Apparent Power (S): This is the combination of real and reactive power and represents the total power supplied to the circuit. It is measured in volt-amperes (VA).

The relationship between these types of power can be represented by the formula:

In a perfectly balanced system, the real power would equal the apparent power, and there would be no reactive power. However, in practical systems, especially those that are unbalanced, the apparent power is typically higher due to the presence of reactive power.

If you are being billed solely on apparent power, it is possible that you are paying not only for the real power consumed but also for the inefficiencies of the system.

The document attached to this blog post contains a whole lot more detail concerning the unbalanced power network condition in Linden and Modderbee.

Click here to start ordering our service.

Newsletter

Our newsletters aim to enlighten our audience about current trends and events. We strive to distribute a newsletter at most once a week, but the frequency may vary to avoid inundating our website visitors with irrelevant content.

The most recent newsletters will be dispatched via email to all individuals on our mailing list and will also be accessible under the Newsletter menu section.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Contravention of Fiduciary Duties

On the 2nd of October 2023, I published an article with the heading “Phase Imbalance in Distribution Networks” in which I stated that “In a recent unrelated “survey”, I came across a 10-minute averaged voltage unbalance of 327% between Phase 2 and Phase 1”. I also asked the question: is Eskom aware what is happening on the Distribution and Reticulation Networks? I also stated that, since the medium-voltage supply comes directly from an Eskom substation which is probably about 20-metres away, one wonders what is going on at the Eskom substation since it is highly unlikely that the voltage unbalance is as a result faulty equipment at the municipal substation. It is as if one phase is completely missing. The same “missing” phase also show an abnormal high current. The neutral current which is supposed to be at or close to zero is also very high.

In a recent webinar, I posted a question about power quality disturbances. I was then told about the large number of Quality of Supply Instrument that Eskom have installed, assuming that it is regularly maintained and monitored so that poor power quality issues will be detected almost immediately, and action taken to rectify whatever may be causing the issue or issues.

Last week, I reached out to someone at Eskom I believe may be able to help me to have this situation investigated or refer me to someone who can assist me, but that email remained unanswered and the email I sent this morning, “was deleted without being read”. This person’s name appears to be involved in this type of work on the behalf of Eskom, and that is why I reached out to him. So, my question now is: do Eskom or any of the Power Distributors care about Poor Quality of Supply?

Click here to start ordering our service.

Newsletter

Our newsletters aim to enlighten our audience about current trends and events. We strive to distribute a newsletter at most once a week, but the frequency may vary to avoid inundating our website visitors with irrelevant content.

The most recent newsletters will be dispatched via email to all individuals on our mailing list and will also be accessible under the Newsletter menu section.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp