Why NERSA’s MYPD6 RAB Redetermination Must Be Rejected in Full

Harmonized Power

Here is a **concise, strong excerpt** suitable for a **website blog preview, homepage teaser, or newsletter intro** (±70–90 words):

South Africans are once again being asked to pay more for electricity while receiving less of it. NERSA’s Redetermination of Eskom’s MYPD6 Regulated Asset Base attempts to shift the cost of decades of mismanagement, inefficiency, and regulatory failure onto consumers. In a context of declining demand, chronic load shedding, worsening power quality, and repeated court losses by the regulator, this decision is neither fair nor defensible. This article explains why the MYPD6 RAB Redetermination must be rejected in full—and why consumers should no longer be forced to carry Eskom’s baggage.

The NERSA Nightmare: Why Are We Paying for Incompetence?

NERSA has once again proven its incompetence—ignoring critical warnings, losing court battles, and forcing consumers to pay billions for technical losses that stem directly from poor power quality. Instead of protecting the public, the regulator has become a liability, wasting taxpayer money while unbalanced networks quietly destroy our equipment and drain our economy. The question is unavoidable: why are we funding failure instead of demanding accountability?

Unlocking Growth: Future-Proofing Asset Management for Long-Term Success

Future-Proofing Asset Management

Future-proofing asset management is not about chasing trends—it’s about building resilient systems that unlock growth over decades. By aligning lifecycle planning, digital transformation, and sustainability, organizations can move beyond short-term fixes and create infrastructure that thrives in uncertainty. The companies that embrace this shift will not only protect their assets but also position themselves as leaders in long-term success.