Electricity tariff increase submissions must be evaluated with rigor, transparency, and fairness. A comprehensive framework considers not only financial sustainability but also efficiency, equity, and long-term impact on consumers and the economy. By applying clear criteria—covering cost drivers, performance benchmarks, and accountability measures—regulators can ensure that tariff decisions balance the needs of utilities with the rights of the public, fostering trust and stability in the energy sector.
Category Archives: Physical Asset Management
Physical asset management is the management of fixed assets such as equipment, plant, buildings, and infrastructure throughout their entire lifecycle. It involves activities such as maintenance, repair, upgrades, and end-of-life disposition of the assets. The purpose of physical asset management is to prolong asset life and keep them in good condition. It also requires implementing controls on purchasing, deployment, tracking and maintaining.
My complaint against City Power Johannesburg highlights deeper systemic issues—poor accountability, unresolved service failures, and a lack of transparency. Despite repeated engagements, the concerns remain ongoing, leaving consumers frustrated and businesses exposed to unnecessary risk. Addressing these failures is not just about fixing one complaint; it’s about demanding a higher standard of governance and ensuring that utilities serve the public with efficiency, fairness, and reliability.
The state of asset management in South Africa reflects both pressing challenges and emerging opportunities. Aging infrastructure, limited investment, and fragmented practices continue to strain performance, yet digital transformation and lifecycle-based strategies are opening new pathways for efficiency and resilience. By embracing modern tools, clear KPIs, and sustainable planning, organizations can move beyond reactive maintenance to build a future-ready asset management culture that supports growth and stability across the economy.
Power quality has a direct influence on client billing—hidden inefficiencies, voltage fluctuations, and unbalanced loads can inflate costs without delivering real value. Poor quality not only damages equipment but also distorts consumption patterns, leading to inaccurate charges and higher operational expenses. By improving monitoring and corrective measures, utilities can ensure fair billing, reduce unnecessary losses, and strengthen trust with their clients.
On the 2nd of October 2023, I published an article with the heading “Phase Imbalance in Distribution Networks” in which I stated that “In a recent unrelated “survey”, I came across a 10-minute averaged voltage unbalance of 327% between Phase 2 and Phase 1”. I also asked the question: is Eskom aware what is happening […]




