Addressing Ongoing Concerns: The State of My Complaint Against City Power Johannesburg

I find myself compelled to revisit and articulate my ongoing concerns regarding the lack of progress on my complaint about the poor service I have received from City Power Johannesburg. This complaint was formally lodged with the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) on April 15, 2024. Unfortunately, since then, I have seen little action taken to address the pressing issues I raised.

A Letter of Disappointment

On October 11, 2024, I received a letter from NERSA’s CEO, addressed to the CEO of City Power. While I won’t delve into the inaccuracies presented in that correspondence, I must highlight a troubling omission: there are no outlined consequences or penalties for City Power. The letter mentioned that the matter “may be escalated to NERSA if there is dissatisfaction from the aggrieved party.” This begs the question: what progress has been made since I first approached City Power on March 12, 2024?

It’s worth noting that City Power contravened Section 4.6.1.1 months ago, which mandates that complaints be resolved within 15 business days. Yet, there have been no repercussions for this breach, raising serious concerns about accountability.

The Need for Accountability

It’s widely understood that utility companies that fail to meet specified quality standards, such as voltage levels, may face fines from NERSA. However, this crucial aspect was notably absent in the recent correspondence. The letter suggested that City Power must engage with the complaint before any mediation could occur. My previous experiences, particularly one from July 2010, lead me to question the efficacy of this approach. In that instance, City Power failed to attend a meeting scheduled by NERSA, resulting in an inconclusive outcome with no meaningful follow-up. This pattern raises concerns about NERSA’s capacity to enforce compliance.

Concerns About NERSA’s Effectiveness

I am increasingly worried about NERSA’s effectiveness as a regulatory body. If a utility company consistently fails to provide reliable service and violates NRS 047 requirements, will there be tangible consequences? My experiences since 2010 have made me skeptical about the enforcement of such measures.

Additionally, I reported significant voltage and current imbalances to NERSA in Modderbee, Springs, yet no action was taken because I am not deemed a customer. This raises broader questions about how power quality issues are managed across different municipalities. I had hoped that NERSA could facilitate communication with the relevant utility companies to address these pressing concerns.

The Role of NERSA: Are We Left to Navigate Alone?

Given the ongoing issues, one must wonder whether both large power users and residential consumers are left to fend for themselves. If that’s the case, what is the purpose of taxpayer funding for an organization like NERSA?

Economic Consequences of Inadequate Power Quality

This topic is not merely bureaucratic; it has real economic implications. Poor power quality can impose substantial financial burdens. For instance, the Leonardo Power Quality Initiative estimates that inadequate power quality costs the European economy up to €150 billion annually, while losses in the United States range from $119 billion to $188 billion, according to the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).

This raises two critical questions: Why do we assume that South Africa’s power quality is better than that of the U.S. or certain European nations? And how can we be confident that all municipalities in South Africa are free from power quality issues? Leaders must provide clarity and transparency in these matters to foster public trust in regulatory bodies.

If poor power quality is evident in major cities like Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni, what implications does this have for smaller towns and cities that may lack access to qualified engineers?

Insights on Negative Phase Sequencing: A Global Perspective

Interestingly, the Agulhas Utilities Corporation’s website attracts significant international traffic, with visitors from the U.S. constituting 61.64% of total traffic, compared to only 6.73% from South Africa. The most frequently visited section—aside from the homepage—focuses on Negative Phase Sequencing, indicating a strong global interest in this subject that extends beyond our local context.

A Call for Reform in the Regulatory Framework

Given these insights, it’s clear that we must reconsider and reform the regulatory framework governing the electrical power industry. Establishing an independent inspectorate with the authority to investigate a wide range of issues is essential. This oversight should encompass local power distributors, private generating companies, and even Eskom. It’s vital that only individuals with the necessary skills and experience are appointed to these positions to ensure effective oversight and accountability within the sector.

As I continue to pursue my complaint, I remain hopeful that our regulatory bodies can evolve to better serve and protect consumers. The time for action is now.

Newsletter

Our newsletters aim to enlighten our audience about current trends and events. We strive to distribute a newsletter at most once a week, but the frequency may vary to avoid inundating our website visitors with irrelevant content.

The most recent newsletters will be dispatched via email to all individuals on our mailing list and will also be accessible under this menu section.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Posted in Best Practices, Power Quality Matters and tagged , , .

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.